VARSHA PALIWAL Vs. RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT & ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) DEFECTS are overruled. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner on admission of the writ petition.

(2.) PETITIONER has preferred this writ petition with a prayer that an appropriate writ, order or direction be issued to respondents to give appointment to the petitioner before making recruitment in pursuance of notification dated 17th December, 2011.

(3.) ADMITTEDLY , even as per submission of learned counsel for petitioner, the name of petitioner was not falling within five General Women Candidates. No less meritorious candidate to the petitioner has been appointed. The petitioner has not pleaded as to whether any reserve/waiting list was prepared and the same was in existence till the issuance of new advertisement vide notification dated 17th December, 2011. The appointments of selected candidates in pursuance of earlier advertisement were made way back on 1st June, 2011. In these circumstances, we find that no legal right of petitioner has been violated in any manner whatsoever. We do not find any merit in this writ petition and the same is, accordingly, dismissed in limine. Stay application is also dismissed.