SANTOSH KUMARI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner, who is said to have rendered services until 28.02.2012 as Pracheta with the Women and Child Development Department, Khajuwala, Bikaner pursuant to the order dated 01.06.2011 after having been sent by a placement agency, has filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs:

(2.) THE petitioner, rather, claims quashing of the so -called order of termination of her services and for directions to the respondents to continue her on the post of Pracheta. The petitioner was engaged for rendering services through placement agency until a particular date, i.e., 28.02.2012; and the term of the contract being already over, the relief as prayed for in this writ petition cannot be granted. It further appears from the document placed on record (Annex.4) that the respondents seek to engage the other in -service persons on deputation for such work of Pracheta. Such a process cannot be said to be that of engagement through any placement agency. No case of infringement of any existing legal right is made out so as to call for interference in the writ jurisdiction.