ROHIT JIVABHAI VALABHAI Vs. UNION OF INDIA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioners.

(2.) THESE writ petitions involve same facts and law, therefore, they were heard together and are being disposed off finally by this common order.

(3.) THERE is no dispute that present posts of the petitioners are transferable posts. The Tribunal has observed that the petitioners are holding their present posts for last about nine years; their representations have been considered by the respondents and by speaking and detailed order, the same have been dismissed. Relevant Paras 2 and 3 of the order passed by the respondents have also been quoted in the impugned order. No statutory rule has been pointed out by learned counsel for the petitioners to show that petitioners' consent was necessary before their transfer. In these circumstances, we find no infirmity or illegality in the order passed by the Tribunal, so as to interfere with the same.