CHANDAN SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) WE have heard the learned senior counsel Mr.Mahesh Bora for the applicant-appellant Chandan Singh, the learned Public Prosecutor Mr. K.R. Bishnoi for the State and so also the learned counsel Mr. Pradeep Shah for the complainant. Scanned through the record. Though several submissions have been made by the learned counsel for the applicant-appellant while pressing on the plea for suspension of execution of sentence as awarded by the Sessions Judge, Balotra in Sessions Case No. 41/2007 by the judgment and order dated 24.06.2011 and the submissions have been duly opposed by the learned Public Prosecutor and so also by the learned counsel appearing for the complainant but then, without entering into any other aspect, we are of opinion that this application deserves to be allowed for the basic reason that the applications of co-accused, more or less similarly placed, have already been allowed.

(2.) WITHOUT commenting on the merits of the case and without entering into any other aspect of the matter, suffice is to observe that this Court has earlier allowed the applications for suspension of execution of sentence as moved on behalf of the co-accused Smt. Desh Kanwar wife of Vijay Singh and Smt. Inder Kanwar wife of Chand Singh on 10.10.2011 [Bail (SoS) Application No. 643/2011]; and thereafter, further allowed the application for suspension of execution of sentence as moved on behalf of co-accused Vijay Singh son of Jor Singh on 27.02.2012 [Bail (SoS) Application No. 1104/2011].