(1.) BOTH the learned counsel for the parties submit at bar that the controversy involved in the present revision petition is covered by a decision of this Court rendered in the case of Uma Shanker Vs. Seth Sugan Chand Charitable Trust Building (SBCRP No.35/2011, decided on 26.08.2011), and the dispute arising in the present case would fall within the domain and jurisdiction of Rent Tribunal as per Section 18 of the Rent Control Act, 2001; and consequently the rejection of the objections of the landlord-petitioner-defendant before this Court, which have wrongly been rejected, deserves to be interfered with.
(2.) THIS Courtr in the case of Uma Shanker (supra), has held as under: