VIJAY KUMAR Vs. JODHPUR VIDHYUT VITRAN NIGAM LTD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) AFTER having heard the learned counsel for the appellant and having perused the material placed on record, we are unable to find any reason to consider interference in this appeal against the order dated 09.07.2012 as passed in CWP No. 7993/2011 whereby the learned Single Judge of this Court has declined to accept the prayer of the petitioner for age relaxation in recruitment to the post of Technical Helper in the respondent Department. The learned Single Judge has dismissed the writ petition with a short order that, in its entirety, reads as under:-

(2.) IN the given fact situation and the admitted position that in the year 2009, the petitioner was indeed possessing eligibility and the recruitments were indeed made but the petitioner-appellant did not avail of the opportunity, the claim as sought to be made for age relaxation with reference to the allegations that the recruitment was not held in the year 2010 could not have been countenanced.