AJAY PRAKASH BIBAN Vs. STATE OF RAJATHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY way of this petition, the petitioners said to be respectively in 26 and 18 years of age and said to have contracted marriage on 08.08.2012, seek the orders for protection while stating threat perceptions, particularly at the hands of the respondent No. 6, said to be the father of the petitioner No. 2.

(2.) FROM the submissions as made in the petition and as urged before the Court, it appears that an FIR bearing number 285/2012 has been registered in the matter at Police Station, Sri Madhopur, District Sikar. According to the petition averments, the marriage of the petitioners was performed as per the Hindu Customs at Arya Samaj, New Delhi; then, a certificate was issued in that regard (Annex. 2); and then, the Registrar of Hindu Marriages-V, Ghaziabad issued the marriage registration certificate (Annex.3). The averment in the petition is not correct that the marriage took place at New Delhi. As per the certificate, the marriage allegedly took place at Vijay Nagar, Ghaziabad.

(3.) WHILE examining the record and the Court noticing that there is no affidavit of the petitioner No.2 in support of the petition, the learned counsel suggested that he may be permitted to get the statements of the petitioner No. 2 recorded. The submission does not inspire confidence.