KANHAIYA LAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the parties.

(2.) PETITIONERS have preferred this writ petition with the following prayers:-

(3.) LEARNED counsel for respondents has not disputed that petitioners were appointed on the post of Mistry Grade-II in the year 1983 and they were holding the post continuously till 1996, when their services were terminated. He has not disputed that the Amended Rule vide Notification dated 1st February, 1992 is still inforce. He also does not dispute that case of Mistry Grade-I have attained finality when their writ petitions were allowed by Single Bench and Special Appeals filed by State were dismissed and, thereafter, Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (Civil) filed by State has also been dismissed.