SYED JALALUDDEEN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This appeal has been filed against the judgment and order dated 10.11.2005 passed in Sessions Case No. 4/2004 whereby the present appellants have been convicted and sentenced as under:-

(2.) The contention of the present appellants is that there are several infirmities and contradictions in the statements of witnesses. The mandatory provisions were not complied with. He has submitted that the provisions of Sections 42, 50, 55 and 57 of the NDPS Act were not complied with. Motbir witnesses have not supported the prosecution story. There is a difference of weight in the sample received at the FSL and he has further submitted that the sentence is excessive.

(3.) The learned Public Prosecutor has submitted that the prosecution has fully proved its case and there is no infirmity in the conviction and sentence.