SAWANT SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) AFTER having heard the learned counsel for the petitioners- appellants and having perused the material placed on record, we are unable to find any reason to entertain this intra-court appeal against the order dated 10.04.2012 as passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in CWP No.7912/2011.

(2.) THE petitioners-appellants preferred the said writ petition seeking to question the order dated 28.02.2011 whereby the Board of Revenue for Rajasthan, Ajmer had dismissed the second appeal filed by them against the judgment and decree as passed by the Revenue Appellate Authority, Bhilwara on 28.02.2001. By the said judgment and decree dated 28.02.2001, the Revenue Appellate Authority had dismissed the first appeal filed against the judgment and decree as passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Gangapur on

(3.) BEFORE the learned Single Judge of this Court in the aforesaid writ petition, the basic argument on behalf of the petitioners- appellants was that the finding of the revenue Courts suffered from perversity because the defendant-respondent Shambhu Singh himself had given in writing that the land belonged to the plaintiff Hari Singh; and that execution of the Taharir was duly proved. The learned Single Judge has found fallacy in the argument as advanced while observing, inter alia, as under: