STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. HARI PRASAD

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS matter came up for orders on an application preferred by the respondent-workman to get early hearing of the writ petition.

(2.) WITH the consent of the parties, the writ petition is heard today itself.

(3.) BEFORE the Labour Court, Sriganganagar, the workman submitted a statement of claim stating therein that he remained in continuous employment of the employer with effect from 01.10.1990 to 15.10.1992 and subsequent thereto he was discontinued from service by an oral order. Alleging non- compliance of the provisions of Section 25-F, 25-G and 25-H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1947'), the workman claimed to declare his retrenchment from service illegal and also a direction for reinstatement in service with all consequential benefits.