ARUN SINGHAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THOUGH the matter was listed for on respondents' application for vacation of stay order dated 15. 10. 2001 but with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the matter is being decided finally since the arguments advanced during the course of hearing by the learned counsel touch upon the merits of the case and keeping in view the fact that the career of large number of students, who are to be appointed on the post of Teachers is involved in the instant matter.

(2.) THE grievance, which has been raised in the writ petition is that both the petitioners are having the requisite qualification for appointment on the post of Teacher Grade-II (Science) in pursuance of the advertisement dated 11. 9. 1998 (Ann. 1) issued by the Director, Sanskrit Education, Rajasthan, Jaipur and hence, they should have been given appointment on the said post. THEir contention is two fold (i) that atleast 35 posts of Teacher Grade-II in all were advertised and the appointment was subject to fulfillment of the terms and conditions and the petitioners had in compliance thereof submitted requisite documents for being considered for appointment (ii) to allow regular pay scale from the date of their appointment.

(3.) IT is not the petitioners' case that were called for interview on the basis of the first advertisement dated 11. 9. 98 though not given appointment on the post of Science Teacher Grade-II. Hence aggrieved by the second advertisement (Ann. 6), they have moved this Court by way of the instant writ petition seeking the grievances inter alia that the impugned advertisement dt. 25. 8. 2001 (Ann. 6) be quashed and set aside and that the respondents be further directed to issue the merit list and to give appointments to the petitioners in pursuance of the earlier advertisement dated 11. 9. 98 (Ann. 1 ).