(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the parties, perused the memo of revision petition and the impugned order.
(2.) WITH the consent of learned Counsel for parties, the following documents are taken on record:
(3.) UNDER order dated 10.1.1996 the plaintiff -respondent No. 1 was appointed on temporary basis as Class IV. It was a purely temporary and adhoc appointment. Learned Counsel for the respondent No. 1 despite of repetedly put by the Court has failed to show that it was a regular appointment of the plaintiff -respondent No. 1 made by petitioner -defendant. After following the Recruitment procedure as laid down in Rajasthan Municipalities, (Class IV) Services Rules. This appointment prima facie is not only de hors of recruitment rules aforestated but also of Constitutional Provisions as contained in Article 16 of the Constitution of India.