OM PRAKASH SRIVASATAVA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ADDITIONAL Superintendent of Police. Anti-Corruption Bureau. Kota, on the basis of information furnished by the informant registered an F. I. R. No. 154/1998 under Section 13 (1) and 13 (2) of Prevention of Corruption Act read with 120-B, IPC.

(2.) THIS petition is filed by the petitioner praying for quashing F. I. R. No. 145/1998, vis-a-vis, the petitioner.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner further submits that sanction of prosecution, so far as the petitioner is concerned is incorrect in the facts and circumstances as stated hereinabove and the F. I. R. at face value is false and deserves to be quashed and set aside vis-a-vis the petitioner by this Court. Proceedings initiated against the petitioner is malicious malafide and with ulterior motive because the petitioner did not commit any offence and was not having any knowledge of the earlier award and subsequent payment and not even an iota of evidence against the petitioner existing on record.