NIRMALA YADAV Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner against the respondents on 20 -6 -2002 with a prayer that by an appropriate writ order or direction the impugned orders dtd. 04 -06 -2002 (Annex. 4) passed by the Collector, Hanumangarh by which the application of respondent No. 7 Tarawanti was accepted and it was directed that the respondent No. 7 be given posting as para teacher at the place of her choice, namely, Bhirani and the order dtd. 10 -6 -2002 (Annex. 5) passed by the Collector, Hanumangarh by which the respondent No. 7 was selected as para teacher against the post of village Bhirani and the letter dt. 12 -6 -2002 by which Block Reference Centre Incharge, D. P. E. P. (respondent No. 6) relieved the petitioner with effect from 12 -6 -2002 from the training course of para teacher be quashed and set aside.

(2.) THE facts as put forward by the petitioner are as under :

(3.) IN this writ petition, the main submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that since she has been selected as para -teacher against the post of village Bhirani and in pursuance of that she has joined training course and was undergoing training, subsequent orders dt. 4 -6 -2002 (Annex. 4) and 10 -6 -2002 (Annex. 5) passed by the Collector without affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner are null and void and therefore, the orders dt. 4 -6 -2002, 10 -6 -2002 and 12 -6 -2002 (Annexures 4, 5 and 6 respectively) should be set aside.