STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. Vs. MADANLAL MEENA

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the appellants.

(2.) THE appellants challenge the order passed by the learned Single Judge allowing the writ petition filed by the respondent Madanlal.

(3.) AGGRIEVED with the order dt. 27.10.2001, the said Madanlal has preferred the Writ Petition No. 4259/2001, which has been allowed by the learned Single Judge by holding that during the pendency of hearing of notice under Section 39 of the Panchayati Raj Act, 1994 and before issuing any declaration under Section 39(2), the petitioner ineligible which will require him to vacate the office elected member of any Panchayati Raj Institution cannot be removed from the office temporarily by ordering suspension. The said judgment of the learned Single Judge is under appeal.