(1.) THE instant revision has been filed against the impugned, order dated 22.9.2001, by which the application of the petitioner under Order 10 Rule 2 read with Order 19 Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short,"the Code") has been rejected.
(2.) THE facts and circumstances giving rise to this case are that non- petitioner/plaintiff filed a suit against the petitioner-defendant for fixing the standard rent of the suit premises with the averments that petitioner- defendant is his tenant on monthly rent of Rs. 607- in a shop of 400 square feet area. An application under Section 7 of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 (hereinafter called"the Act, 1950") for fixing the provisional rent was also filed and for that purpose, the non- petitioner/plaintiff produced some affidavits. Petitioner filed the aforesaid application for permission of cross-examining the deponents thereof, which has been rejected vide impugned order on-the ground that such proceedings are summary in nature and cross-examination cannot be permitted. Hence this revision.
(3.) ON the contrary, Mr. Kalla, learned counsel for respondent, has opposed the application on the ground that the proceedings to determine the provisional rent are summary in nature, therefore, the application has been rightly rejected as provisions of Order 19 are not attracted in a case deciding such an application and this Court should not give any indulgence in this regard.
ABOUT US "REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD." is a Company incorporated in 1991 under the provisions of the Companies Act, 1956. Since its inception to 1995, the Company was busy in carrying out the activities related to various Banks' Job Work..
Read More
Sales: sales@the-laws.com
Support: info@the-laws.com
8000853936
9376168072
27, 4TH FLOOR, Agrawal Center, Ashram Road, Income Tax, Ahmadabad 380014.
LOGIN