BANSHI LAL Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS miscellaneous petition is directed against the order dated May 26,1989, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge No. 2, Hanumangarh, by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioners.

(2.) CHANDU Mal filed a complaint against Banshi Lal, Ram Chandra and Smt. Kali under Section 498 I. P. C. in the Court of the Munsif and Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Suratgarh, on the allegations made in the complaint. The learned Magistrate sent this complaint under Section 156 (3) Cr. P. C. to the Station House Officer, Police Station, Suratgarh, for investigation. The police, after necessary investigation, submitted the Final Report in the matter. After receipt of the Final Report, notice was given to the complainant and the complainant filed a protest petition. The learned Magistrate thereafter, after considering the Final Report and the evidence collected by the police during investigation, took cognizance against the petitioners under Section 498 IPC. and issued processes. Dissatisfied with the order dated February 5, 1988, passed by the learned Magistrate, taking cognizance against the petitioners, the petitioners preferred a revision petition before the learned Additional Sessions Judge No. 2 Hanumangarh, who by his order dated May, 26, 1989, rejected the revision-petition filed by the petitioners. It is against this order that the present petition under Section 482 Cr. P. C. has been filed.