RAKESH KUMAR Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner by this writ petition has prayed that the order dated 11. 1. 1991 (Annex. 14) may be quashed and the order dated 1. 12. 1984 whereby the petitioner was temporarily promoted as U. D. C-cum-Steno may be maintained.

(2.) THE petitioner was appointed on 24. 12. 79 on the post of L. D. C. THE petitioner passed his Higher Secondary Examination with English Stenography and Typing as one of the subjects. THE petitioner was made permanent on the post of L. D,c. by the order dated 4. 1. 1983. THEre was one post of U. D. C-cum-Steno available in the office of respondent No. 2. THErefore, the petitioner applied for that and he was appointed as U. D. C-cum-Steno by the order dated 1. 12. 1984 on temporary basis. He was given the salary of the post of U. D. C-cum-Steno and a special pay of Rs. 25/- per month. THEreafter on account of the vacancy caused by voluntary retirement of one person a vacancy of U. D. C.-cum-Steno became available and the petitioner was allowed to continue against this post by the order dated 8. 4. 1986. THEreafter, the petitioner's services were only extended upto 11. 1. 1991 and he was not allowed to continue on this post. It is alleged that some complaints were filed against the petitioner but no such material, in these circumstances the petitioner has filed the present writ petition.

(3.) LEARNED counsel further submitted that the person who was appointed much after him, i. e. Shri Narain Lal Lakhara, has been retained and he has been reverted.