SIYA RAM Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE petitioner, who now stands retired from Govt. Service, has filed this writ petition challenging the order dated 28.1.75 (Ann. 28), order dated 29.11.77 (Ann. 29), order dated 18.10.79 (Ann. 31), and order dated 13.2.81 (Ann. 33).

(2.) THE first order is an order passed by the Director, Department of Ayurved. Govt. of Rajasthan Ajmer removing the petitioner from service on the basis of a Departmental Enquiry held against him in respect of the charge -sheet dt. 30.12.69. The second order is an order dismissing appeal of the petitioner. Third one is a communication regarding dismissal of review petition filed by the petitioner and the fourth order is also a communication regarding dismissal of his review petition.

(3.) MANY grounds have been raised in the writ petition challenging the order of punishment and subsequent orders passed on appeal as well as on review petition. One of them is that the order has not been passed in conformity with Rule 16(10) and Rule 16(12) of the CCA. Rules 1958. The other one is that Enquiry officer has not appreciated the evidence properly. The Disciplinary Authority did not apply its mind. Allegation of malafide have also been levelled against respondent No. 4 who held the office of Director Ayurved Department at the relevant time.