MOHAMMED YASIN Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE above petitions, filed under section 482 Cr. P. C. , may be disposed of together by a common order as they arise from the same case.

(2.) IN short the facts arc : Mohammed Yasin (hereinafter to be referred as the 'complainant') made a report at Police Station Manak Chowk, Jaipur on August 22, 1981. On this report, crime No. 444/81 was registered under sections 420, 468 and 471 I. P. C. The said report was against Sohan Lal (hereinafter to be referred as 'the accused') and his brother Prahlad (since deceased ). IN the said report, the complainant alleged that he was having a non-temporary stage carriage permit for the route 'sikar-Juliasar Ki-Piou' and the bus bearing registration No. RJI 1150 was purchased by him from the accused Sohan Lal. He further stated that the accused was working as his driver on the aforesaid bus and plied the same on the aforesaid route on his behalf. The accused and his brother forged an agreement to sale and a power of attorney in their favour, after forging the signatures of the complainant and on the basis of those documents, got the registration of the bus transferred in their name. The case of the complainant was that he did not execute any agreement to sale, as well as, any power of attorney in favour of the accused.

(3.) I have heard Mr. R. N. Munshi, learned counsel for the complainant and Mr. R. K. Yadav, learned counsel for the accused.