NARENDRA KUMAR KOTHARI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a plaintiff's revision petition in a suit for arrears of rent, which has been partially decreed.

(2.) THE premises in question were let out to the defendant the State of Rajasthan on a monthly rent of Rs. 113/ -. In addition to this, water and electricity charges were to be paid by the defendant tenant.

(3.) IN the instant case the broad feature of the case, which are not id dispute are as under:- (1) That there was no written agreement of the tenancy from which the promise date and terms of the tenancy can be ascertained. (2) That inspite of a registered notice served on the defendant which was sent on 24. 2. 1972, all that the plaintiff is contesting is that the ntoice was not in accordance with section 106 of the Transfer of Properly Act. (3) That there is no dispute and in any case it is not the finding of the lower court that the premises were not vacated on the date mentioned in the notice.