PUSHPA DEVI Vs. KISHANLAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is an appeal by mother of' the minor Om Prakash under Section 47 of the Guardian and Wards Act (No. viii of 1890) (for short 'the Act') against the order dated September 4, 1979 of the District Judge, Jodhpur by which he accepted the father's petition Under Section 25 of the Act.

(2.) THE respondent will hereinafter be referred to as the petitioner and the appellant as the non -petitioner.

(3.) I have heard Mr. S.S. Purohit for the appellant and Mr, M.L. Kala for the respondent and have carefully perused the record of the case. Mr. S.S. Purohit learned Counsel for the appellant contended that the finding of the learned District Judge that it is in the welfare of the minor Om Prakash to order return of his custody to the petitioner, is erroneous. Mr. Kala has supported the order under appeal.