KUM KUM JHALANI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE prospect of realising social justice is remote unless Articles 38 and 39 (b) & (f) go into militant action and unless THEre is a committed cadre of civil servants. The neutral civil service abhorrence to peoples demands, contradicts social justice. "

(2.) THE above observation of Mr. Justice V. R. Krishna Iyer (1) aptly apply to the present tragic tale of a physically handicapped lady, a victim of injustice at the alter of bureaucracy's apathy and abhorrence for God cursed handicapped.

(3.) MAKING the limited agreement of Justice Iyer & Shelat as the Pivot and leaving the controversy of the two, taking inspiration from Iyer but again with Shelat's limitation and restraints, let me state the tragic tale of a Physically handicapped lady, who prays for "social Justice", in "substantial form", from an "equitable forum of Article 226. "