HAMIRSINGH Vs. PEETHSINGH

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS is a revision against an order of the District Judge, Balotra, disallowing the appeal against an order of the Civil Judge, Balotra.

(2.) THE petitioners sued the opposite party in the Court of the Civil Judge, Balotra, on the 18th of August, 1948, for possession of one well, known as Nayoda well, along with the land appurtenant thereto and 19 other fields mentioned in para 2 of the plaint, situated at village Mithuda, Tehsil Siwana, on the allegation that the said lands belonged to the plaintiffs but had been wrongly occupied by the defendants. THE plaintiffs also added another claim in the suit in respect of possession of three plots of land in the village suitable for residential houses as also mesne profits amounting to Rs. 957/- in respect of the agricultural land.