RAM LAL KRISHAK Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) In wake of onslaught of COVID-19, abundant caution is being taken while hearing the matters in Court.

(2.) The petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India claiming the following reliefs:

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the short question involved in this case is that the petitioner was facing criminal trial, and therefore, his renewal application was not being considered but now once the acquittal has been done by the competent court, the renewal application shall have to be considered by the respondents as the bar under Rule 18-A of the Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Rules, 1996 (for short 'the Rules of 1996) would not apply.