NARENDRA KUMAR @ KALLU Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Reportable

(2.) Facts relevant and germane for disposal of the appeal are noted hereinbelow:

(3.) Thereafter, interrogation was conducted and informations provided by the accused under Section 27 of the Evidence Act were recorded. Acting in furtherance of the informations provided under Section 27 Indian Evidence Act by the three accused viz., Chandrapal @ Kalu (Ex.P2), Gautam Giri (Ex.P36) and Narendra Kumar (Ex.P49), the place of incident was verified by the Investigating Officer. The place where the weapon of offence was concealed by Gautam Giri was also verified by the Investigating Officer at the instance of the accused Chandrapal @ Kalu vide Memo Ex.P5. On the basis of the information (Ex.P37) provided by Gautam Giri, the Investigating Officer claims to have recovered the weapon of offence being an iron dagger which was seized vide Memo Ex.P16.