HARISH BAIRANI Vs. MEENA ALIAS RIYA BAIRANI

JUDGEMENT

(1.) The Registry has pointed out two defects: firstly, the court fees of Rs. 2 has not been affixed on the revision petition. Secondly, the certified copy of the order dated 29.02.2008 has not been filed. Despite the lapse of three years, the defects have not been cured . However, even on merits, the case is a weak one for the following reasons:

(2.) Mr. Santosh Kumar Jain, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, has vehemently contended that there is no allegation of any domestic violence being committed by the Petitioner upon the Respondent-wife. Secondly, since the Respondent-wife does not stay with him, therefore, he is not liable to pay for her treatment.

(3.) Heard the learned Counsel and perused the impugned orders.