REGENT COMPUTRONICS PVT. LTD.

Pawan Kumar Bardiya Appellant

V/S

STATE OF RAJASTHAN Respondents

Referred Judgements :-

DR. PUSHPA GUPTA VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS. [REFERRED TO]
DR. BANSHI LAL JAKHAR VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ANR [REFERRED TO]
INDRA KUMAR MEENA AND ORS. VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS [REFERRED TO]
HARI SINGH BHARTIYA HOTEL VS. MILITARY ESTATE OFFICER:UNION OF INDIA [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. JAGANNATH ACHYUT KARANDIKAR [REFERRED TO]
E RAMAKRISHNAN VS. STATE OF KERALA [REFERRED TO]
AMI LAL BHAT VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
SURAJ PRAKASH GUPTA VS. STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR [REFERRED TO]
ALIGARH MUSLIM UNIVERSITY VS. MANSOOR ALI KHAN [REFERRED TO]
PITTA NAVEEN KUMAR VS. RAJA NARASAIAH ZANGITI [REFERRED TO]
STATE OF M P VS. SANJAY KUMAR PATHAK [REFERRED TO]
ASSISTANT COMMERCIAL TAXES OFFICER GANGANAGAR 41 VS. GANESH CHIMINI EEAT BHATTA UTPADAK SAHAKARI SAMITI LTD [REFERRED TO]
INDER BHAN SINGH GUJAR VS. STATE OF RAJASTHAN [REFERRED TO]
MAHESH KUMAR VS. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN & ORS. [REFERRED TO]

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS bunch of writ petitions arc decided by this common order as it involves common question of law.

(2.) RAJASTHAN Public Service Commission (for short 'the Commission') issued an advertisement dated 5.7.2008 calling for applications for the post of Agriculture Officer and Assistant Agriculture Officer. Petitioners applied for the posts. The candidature of petitioners is liable to be rejected as they have crossed maximum age limit provided under the advertisement. As per relevant clause, one should not have attained the age more than 35 years as on 1.1.2009 and, at the same time, should not be less than 20 years of age.

(3.) SOME of the petitioners accordingly submitted representation for grant of age relaxation but no heed was paid by the respondents on the aforesaid.

Click here to view full judgment.

PAWAN KUMAR BARDIYA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

Referred Judgements :-

JUDGEMENT

QUick Links

Get in Touch

Email

Contact Numbers

Address