GULJAR MOHAMMAD Vs. CHANDA BANOO

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE Registry has pointed out a defect that the Judge, Family Court, Ajmer could not be arrayed as a party-respondent. THE said defect is yet to be removed.

(2.) HOWEVER, even on merits, the case is on a weak wicket. The petitioner has challenged the order dated 04.03.2004, passed by the Judge, Family Court, Ajmer, whereby the learned Judge has granted an interim maintenance of Rs.500/- per month in favour of respondent No.1, Smt. Chanda Banoo.

(3.) FOR the reasons stated above, this Court does not find any illegality or perversity in the impugned order. This petition, being devoid of any merit is, hereby, dismissed. The stay petition also stands dismissed.