(1.) AGGRIEVED by the order dated 10.06.2010, passed by the Additional District and Sessions Judge (Fast Track), Sikar, whereby the learned Judge has dismissed the Petitioner's application under Section 216 Code of Criminal Procedure and has framed the charges against the Petitioner for offences under Sections 307, 342 and 323 IPC, the Petitioner has approached this Court.
(2.) MR . R.D.S. Naruka, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner, has vehemently contended that according to the injury report, the injured, Ramavatar, had suffered merely simple injuries. Therefore, the injuries are neither dangerous to life, nor sufficient to cause his death in the ordinary course of nature. Thus, no offence under Section 307 IPC has been made out. However, despite the lack of evidence, a charge under Section 307 IPC has been framed against the Petitioner.
(3.) HEARD the learned Counsel for the parties and perused the impugned order.