RAMILA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record. The applicant is accused of offence under Sections 19/54 and 54-A, Excise Act.

(2.) Learned Public Prosecutor opposed the bail application.

(3.) Having considered all the relevant facts and looking to the fact that the accused-applicant is owner of the vehicle in which contraband articles were recovered and that she was not present at the spot when the recovery was made, I deem it just and proper to grant anticipatory bail to the applicant under Sec. 438 Crimial P.C.