HARI SINGH AND ANR Vs. SATYANARAIN AND ORS

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This is an intra court appeal filed by the writ petitioner of Writ Petition No.9532 of 2010 under Rule 134 of the Rajasthan High Court Rules against an order dt. 6.4.2011 passed by Single Judge in aforementioned writ petition.

(2.) Facts of the case lie in a narrow compass. It can be gathered from the order of the learned Single Judge impugned herein. Since the order of the Single Judge is a short one, and hence it is reproduced inform in full.

(3.) Mere perusal of the aforequoted order of the Single Judge would go to show that appellant, who is a tenant has suffered eviction decree from the original court, then upheld by the Tribunal as an appellate Court and lastly by the Writ Court by impugned order. So it is a concurrent decree of eviction suffered by the appellant from all Courts. Though it was upheld yet the Writ Court in its extra ordinary jurisdiction while dismissing the writ petition granted time to the appellant till December 2011 to vacate the tenanted accommodation.