LAWS(RAJ)-2011-3-35

SATYA NARAIN Vs. BALDEV KRISHAN

Decided On March 11, 2011
SATYA NARAIN Appellant
V/S
BALDEV KRISHAN Respondents

JUDGEMENT

(1.) This second appeal is being decided by the consent of both the parties, at the admission stage. Heard the learned counsel for both the parties.

(2.) This second appeal has been filed by the defendant appellant tenant, against the decree of eviction passed by the learned appellate court , i.e., the District Judge, Churu.

(3.) The suit was filed by the respondent plaintiff, against the appellant defendant, for eviction of property on various grounds, including grounds of bonafide and reasonable necessity, sub-letting, material alteration, and change of user, and the learned trial court decreed the suit only on the basis of bonafide and reasonable necessity, which was affirmed by the first appellate court vide impugned order dated 08.11.2010.