HAKIM SINGH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) BY this writ petition, a challenge has been made to the order of termination dated 24.3.1994.

(2.) NO explanation of delay has been given as to why writ petition has been preferred after a lapse of 16 years of the date of passing of the impugned order.

(3.) HOWEVER, I have considered the matter on merit also and find that even while trying the case court has taken note of the fact that all the documents from P-4 to P-9 were containing petitioner's date of birth as 5.8.1971, but, later on, by over-writing, it was changed to 10.1.1974. During the course of arguments, learned counsel could not specify as to how date of birth of the petitioner was changed to 10.1.1974 when it was throughout recorded as 5.8.1971 in all the relevant documents which include original application of the petitioner for admission in school showing date of birth as 5.8.1971, scholar register, certificate of passing Class-VIII, transfer certificate book, character certificate etc. In all those documents, date of birth of the petitioner has been recorded as 5.8.1971, which was, later on, changed to 10.1.1974 by fraudulent means and it is only abovesaid certificate which was produced by the petitioner.