MANAK CHAND Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused material made available to me during course of arguments.

(2.) IN my opinion, filing of this application for grant of anticipatory bail is nothing but sheer misuse of process of the court. Petitioner has filed this application for grant of anticipatory bail because he was summoned to be joined as an accused by order of trial court dated 24.11.2010 accepting application of complainant under Section 319 Cr.P.C. Admittedly petitioner filed Criminal Revision Petition No.603/2009 against aforesaid order before this court, in which originally on 08.05.2009 stay order was passed but subsequently that stay order was vacated and it is thereafter that the warrant of arrest was issued against petitioner.