BHANWAR LAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE learned counsel for the petitioners has made a very limited prayer before this Court. According to him, he is not challenging the impugned order on merit, but merely requests that the non-bailable warrants issued against the petitioners should be converted into bailable ones.

(2.) MR. A.K. Gupta, has contended that when a process is issued under Section 319 Cr.P.C., initially summons should be issued, or at worse bailable warrants should have been issued, instead of issuing non-bailable warrants at the first instance. In order to buttress this contention, the learned counsel has relied upon the case of Inder Mohan Goswami & Anr. Vs. State of Uttaranchal & Ors. [AIR 2008 SC 251].