NARENDRA SINGH Vs. RSRTC

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS writ petition has been filed to challenge order dated 5.10.2009.

(2.) LEARNED counsel submits that petitioner was initially appointed on the post of Driver-cum-Conductor vide order dated 7.6.2005 and his term was extended from time to time by the respondents. His services were terminated when he was found carrying passengers without tickets but, vide order dated 7.5.2007, he was again appointed on contract basis with a stipulation that petitioner will be assigned duty of driver only. However, vide order dated 5.10.2009, services of the petitioner were again terminated on violation of clause 11 of the contract by the petitioner.