NARENDRA SHARMA Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS seventh bail application has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

(2.) BRIEF tacts of the case are that for the occurrence took place on 9.3.2009 an FIR was lodged on 1.8.2009 by one Govind Ram against three accused persons Narendra, Shankar Lal and Pooranmal for the offence under Section 420, 406 and 120 B IPC. It is stated that for marriage of complainant's sons, Narendra Sharma, the accused petitioner and co-accused Pooranmal Sharma demanded Rs. 6,00,000/- and after taking the amount, the girls run away just after a day of marriage.

(3.) IT is contended by the learned counsel for the accused petitioner that the offence is triable by Magistrate of first Class and he is behind the bars since long and the Hon'ble Court rejected the fifth bail application with observation that trial may be expedited as early as possible but till date no evidence was recorded before the trial Court. IT was argued that there is no chance of tempering with any evidence if the petitioner is granted the benifit of bail.