STATE OF RAJASTHAN Vs. CHIRANJILAL

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE State has challenged the judgment dated 13.01.2011 passed by the Sessions Court, Jaipur City, Jaipur, whereby the learned Judge has acquitted the accused-respondent for offences under Sections 363, 366A and 376 IPC.

(2.) THE brief facts of the case are that on 04.05.2010, the complainant, Sukhlal, lodged a written report before the Police Commissioner, Jaipur city (East) stating therein that on 13.04.2010 when he returned to his home in the evening, he found that his daughter was not at home. When he searched for her, he found that his daughter is with Harphool Dhobi, Chirangi Dhobi, Sitaram Dhobi, Kanahiya Lal Dhobi, Kailashi Bai, Hari Ram Dhobi, Keli Bai in village Rawal, Sawai Madhopur. He went there. THEy asked him to forget about his daughter otherwise he will lose his life. THE said report was sent to Muhana Police Station. It was registered as FIR, FIR No.148/2010 for offence under Sections 363 and and 366 IPC. THE statements of the witnesses and prosecutrix under Sections 161 Cr.P.C., and 164 Cr.P.C., were recorded. After investigation, a charge-sheet was filed against Chiranji Lal for offences under Sections 363, 366A and 376 IPC. Vide order dated 13.01.2011, the accused-respondent was acquitted from the aforementioned offences. Hence, this petition before this Court.

(3.) THEREFORE, this Court does not find any illegality or perversity in the impugned order. Hence, the revision petition is devoid of any merit; it is, hereby, dismissed.