SHIMLA DEVI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned counsel for the petitioner.

(2.) PETITIONER has preferred this revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 Cr.P.C. challenging the impugned judgment and order dated 25.02.2009 passed by Additional District & Sessions Judge(Fast Track) No. 3, Bharatpur, Head Quarter Bayana, acquitting the accused-Respondents No. 2 to 7 from the charges under Sections 120-B, 148, 447, 451, 323/149, 302 and 302/149 I.P.C.

(3.) LEARNED counsel for the petitioner fairly and frankly admitted that the petitioner was not eye-witness to the incident. In this connection, it is relevant to mention that it is for the prosecution/Public Prosecutor to examine or not to examine any witness out of list of witnesses produced alongwith charge sheet.