ANIL KUMAR Vs. STATE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) ON conviction for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 364 and 201 Indian Penal Code by the judgment dated 4.2.2011, the accused appellants are sentenced as under:-

(2.) BRIEF facts of the case are that one Suresh Kumar (PW-3) submitted a written report (Ex.P/6) dated 28.9.2010 at Police Station Bhirani about missing of his brother Suman (deceased) since 22.9.2010. An FIR then was lodged at the stance of Suresh Kumar on 2.10.2010 stating therein that he and his mother Smt. Savitri (PW-4) in morning of the day came to know somewhere from village that Suman was taken on a motorcycle by Anil Kumar son of Hawa Singh and Sanjay son of Mahendra to the agricultural field of Sanjay, where he was killed by Sanjay, Budhram son of Leeladhar, Budhram son of Jile Singh, Lalchand and Charan Singh by giving serious beating with lathis after tiding hands and legs. The body of Suman then was thrown in Canal Amar Singh Branch. The decomposed body on search was found near 46 RD Bridge. On receiving the information aforesaid a case was registered, investigation was made and police report as per Section 173 Cr.P.C. was filed before the competent court. The case then was committed to the court of Sessions and the accused persons were charged for the offences punishable under Sections 302, 364 and 201 Indian Penal Code.

(3.) THE prosecution supported its case with the aid of eye witnesses and recovery made at the instance of the accused persons. So far as the eye witnesses are concerned, suffice it to mention that not a single person supported the prosecution story.