UDAI PAL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) Both the above writ petitions involve common controversy of law, therefore, these writ petitions are decided by this common order. For the sake of convenience, facts of S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12074/2010, Udai Pal vs. State of Rajasthan & Others are taken into consideration. In the writ petition, the petitioner has made the following prayer:

(2.) Main contention of the petitioner is that although he was appointed on the post of Beldar and was granted semi-permanent status on the said post vide Annex. 1 dated 12.10.1995 but he is entitled to be absorbed on the post of Store Munshi. Learned counsel for the petitioner further prayed that screening committee was constituted for the purpose of granting semi-permanent status on the post of Store Munshi, in which, name of the petitioner is also appearing. Case of the petitioner was considered by the screening committee constituted by the Department vide Annex. 4 dated 23.6.2007 and, in the proceedings, petitioner's case was also appearing at S. No. 202. Therefore, the petitioner is entitled for absorption on the post of Store Munshi, so also, for granting semi-permanent status on the post of Store Munshi.

(3.) Learned counsel for the petitioner invited my attention towards the following judgments: