MUKESH Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) AGGRIEVED by the order dated 27.11.2009, by the order dated 16.01.2010 and by the order dated 19.06.2010, the petitioner has approached this Court.

(2.) THE first two orders, dated 27.11.2009 and dated 16.01.2010, have been passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur. Vide order dated 27.11.2009, the learned Magistrate had decided to frame the charges for offences under Sections 498A and 406 IPC against the petitioners. Vide order dated 16.01.2010, the learned Magistrate had formally framed the charges. Aggrieved by the orders dated 27.11.2009 and dated 16.01.2010, the petitioner had filed a revision petition before the Additional Sessions Judge, Sambhar Lake, District Jaipur. However, vide order dated 19.06.2010, the learned Judge has confirmed the orders dated 27.11.2009 and dated 16.01.2010 and has dismissed the revision petition filed by the petitioner.

(3.) THE learned Judge has fairly appreciated the contentions raised by the learned counsel for the revisionist and has correctly held that the learned trial court would certainly have the jurisdiction to try the case.