REENA Vs. RAJENDRA SINGH AND ORS.

JUDGEMENT

(1.) NOBODY is present for the Petitioner.

(2.) THIS writ petition filed way back on 24.11.2010 is pending for admission and has been adjourned several times. It is appears that the Petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting this writ petition any further.

(3.) THE Petitioner has submitted in this writ petition that the Respondent No. 5 has other sources of income in a Grocery Shop and further, that the said Respondent has agricultural income too, whereas the Petitioner has No. source of income. It is submitted that 70% amount of No. fault liability award ought to have been allowed to the Petitioner.