GOVIND KUMAR Vs. DISTRICT JUDGE

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE present petitioner (original plaintiff) has filed the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 3.11.2010 passed by the learned District Judge (Dausa) (here-in-after referred to as the "appellate court") in Civil Misc. Appeal No. 48/2010, whereby the appellate court has set-aside the order dated 9.4.2010 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Lalsot, District Dausa (here-in-after referred to as the "trial court") in Civil Misc. Application No. 73/2008.

(2.) IT appears that the petitioner (original plaintiff) has filed the suit before the trial court seeking permanent injunction restraining the respondent nos. 2, 3 and 4 (original defendants) from removing the plaintiff from the post of Rojgar Sahayak at Gram Panchayat Dob and seeking mandatory injunction to pay him the wages. The petitioner-plaintiff had also moved an application seeking temporary injunction being no. 73/2008, which came to be allowed by the trial court vide order dated 9.4.2010, whereby the Gram Panchayat, Dob was restrained from removing the petitioner-plaintiff from the post of Rojgar Sahayak. Being aggrieved by the said order, the respondents (original defendants) had filed the appeal being Civil Misc. Appeal No. 48/2010 before the appellate court, which came to be allowed vide order dated 3.11.2010. The petitioner has challenged the said order before this Court by way of present petition.

(3.) BE that as it may, it is expected that the respondents shall pay the wages to the petitioner, if, in-fact, he had worked as Rojgar Sahayak and if his presence has been marked in the attendance register is maintained by the concerned Gram Panchayat.