RAM BHAROSI Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THIS appeal is directed against the judgment dated 27. 10. 99 passed by the Special Judge NDPS Act Cases and Sessions Judge, Dholpur, by which he has convicted accused appellant Ram Bharosi for offence u/sec. 8/18 and 8/20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985 and sentenced him to undergo ten years rigorous imprisonment on each count and to pay of fine of Rs. one lac each, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo two years rigorous imprisonment each.

(2.) THE prosecution story unfolded during trial was that on 15. 8. 98 PW. 11 Sarad Choudhary, Dy. Superintendent of Police, Dholpur received telephonic information from the S. H. O. , Police Station, Kotwali that one Ram Bharosi by caste Goswami, R/o Donari is taking with him opium and Charas on a Rajdoot motor cycle, having no registration number on it, for the purposes of selling the same to a drugs' contractor, which he recorded in Ex. P-17 and telephonically informed the Superintendent of Police. He also informed him in writing vide Ex. P-18. THEreafter, he left for the Police Station, Kotwali along with Head Constable Jal Singh and two Constables Balvinder Singh and Hari Singh, where he discussed with Shri Jagan Lal Meena, SHO about the said information and having found the information trustworthy he along with police party proceeded to Bhamtipura Tiraha in a Government Gypsy. He found one person sitting on Rajdoot Motor-cycle having no registration number on it and busy in talking with some other person, who on seeking the police, managed to escape from there, but he caught hold of the person sitting on the motor-cycle. He disclosed his identify that he is Dy. S. P. Sharad Chaudhary, C. O. , Dholpur and is a Gazetted Officer. THEreafter, he asked the accused vide notice Ex. P. 20 as to whether he wants to get the search conducted by the Dy. S. P. himself who is a Gazetted Officer or by a Magistrate or in presence of a Magistrate. THE accused consented in writing that he (Dy. S. P.) himself may take search in the absence of Magistrate. THEreafter, he conducted search of accused vide Ex. P. 11. On search he found opium in 35 small paper pockets from the left pocket and charas in 50 small papers packets from right pocket of his shirt. He prepared seizure memo Ex. P. 12, arrested the accused vide arrest memo Ex. P. 13 seized the motor- cycle vide memo Ex. p. 14. On asking for licence, the accused replied that he has no licence. He got the contraband articles weighed and the opium and charas were weighing 145 grams and 225 grams respectively. THE samples were taken. THE samples and the remaining contraband were sealed.

(3.) I have heard the learned counsel for the accused appellant and the learned Public Prosecutor and carefully examined the impugned judgment and the record of the trial Court.