GULABI Vs. JUDGE MACT AJMER

JUDGEMENT

(1.) THE appellant is the injured claimant in this appeal who had filed a claim petition before the MACT Ajmer. An application was also moved alongwith the claim application for seeking interim relief as was required under Section 92-A of the Unamended Act, which was application at that time.

(2.) THE Tribunal concerned, dismissed the aforesaid application filed for seeking interim relief on 15. 9. 1989, therefore, the parties had led the evidence. It is stated that the whole of the evidence was led by the Tribunal vide its impugned award and dismissed the said application. THE Tribunal had also found that the passenger in question was a gratuitous passenger and therefore, she was not entitled to any amount of compensation.