MAN PHOOL Vs. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

JUDGEMENT

(1.) HEARD learned Counsel for the appellant.

(2.) THE appellant has made an application for allotment of land in question way -back in 1979 which has been allotted to another applicant, who has also moved an application around the same time. The appellant -petitioner has sought allotment as sub -tenant of one Nathu, who sought to step into his shoes for permanent allotment as a sub -tenant.

(3.) THE learned Single Judge has found that since Nathu has not made any application for permanent allotment of land, therefore, he himself had no right to secure permanent allotment of the land earlier held by him under the Conditions of 1970. Hence, no right could accrue to the petitioner and therefore, the orders of the Revenue Appellate Authorities were upheld. In coming to the conclusion, no error appears to have been committed.