(1.) HEARD the learned counsel for the parties.
(2.) THE present appeal is preferred against the judgment dated 15. 7. 1997 passed by the learned Single Judge of this court in the writ petition filed by the appellant.
(3.) THE learned counsel for the appellant also further argued that this court has not appreciated the Scheme of Rules of 1962 in right perspective. Various other categories which are entitled to get relaxation are covered under rule 11-B of the rules but while granting relaxation to various categories, the rules making authorities have put a barrier that no one will cross 50 years of age as per rule 11-B. Meaning thereby, Rule 11-B, being special rule which only deals with the age of the candidates who are appearing in the examination and if there is any other rule in the scheme of Rules of 1962, if permits to take note of 50 years, will be contrary to Rule 11-B and thus, the age limit which is prescribed for the candidates who are appearing as general category is 21 to 33 years and likewise for the candidates appearing against N. G. E. quota, the age limit is 25 to 40 years and thus, the candidates who are appearing as an open market and are member of Scheduled Caste/ Scheduled Tribe, their age will be construed to be 33 + 5 as an open market as provided under Rule 11-B (1) of the Rules of 1962 which will be 40 + 5 = 45 years which has not been examined by the learned Single Judge in the right perspective.